合肥生活安徽新聞合肥交通合肥房產生活服務合肥教育合肥招聘合肥旅游文化藝術合肥美食合肥地圖合肥社保合肥醫院企業服務合肥法律

        代寫CDS526、代做c/c++,Python程序設計
        代寫CDS526、代做c/c++,Python程序設計

        時間:2025-03-27  來源:合肥網hfw.cc  作者:hfw.cc 我要糾錯



        CDS526: Artificial Intelligence-based Optimization
        Case Study: Multi-objective Optimisation
        1 Task
        This case study is composed of two main tasks, problem solving (detailed in Section 2) and paper presentation
        (detailed in Section 3), aiming at strengthening your understanding of multi-objective optimisation and appli cations of multi-objective optimisation algorithms. This case study will take 20% in your final mark of this
        course (thus 20 points).
        This is a group project. Each group should be composed of no more than four individuals. Each individual’s
        mark depends on the correctness of the answers to the questions (cf. Section 2) and his/her performance in
        group presentations (cf. Section 3).
        2 Problem Solving (10 marks)
        Context
        An investor needs to select an appropriate portfolio from a set of investment options, aiming to minimize
        investment risk degree (f1) and maximize investment return degree (f2). There are currently seven portfolio
        options, with their corresponding f1 (risk) and f2 (return) values as follows:
        A(1, 1), B(10, 9), C(5, 1), D(2, 3), E(8, 4), F(5, 5), G(7, 6)
        Here, a lower f1 value indicates lower risk, and a higher f2 value indicates higher return. f1 and f2 are integers
        ∈ {1, . . . , 50}.
        Question 1: Portfolio comparison. (2 marks)
        (1.1) Comparing Portfolio F(5, 5) and Portfolio C(5, 1), which one is better? Analyse from the perspectives of
        risk and return and provide reasoning. (1 mark)
        (1.2) Comparing Portfolio G(7, 6) and Portfolio E(8, 4), which one is better? Analyse from the perspectives of
        risk and return and provide reasoning. (1 mark)
        Question 2: Identify all non-dominated solutions in the given seven portfolios. (1 mark)
        Question 3: Investor preference matching. (2 marks)
        There are currently two investors:
        • The first investor is conservative, aiming to minimize investment risk (f1) and having lower requirements
        for return (f2).
        • The second investor is aggressive, willing to take higher risks (f1) and aiming solely to maximize investment
        return (f2).
        From the non-dominated solution set, select the most suitable portfolio for each investor and explain the rea soning.
        Question 4: Investment portfolio selection based on preferences. (5 marks)
        Assume that the investment portfolio options satisfy the formula f2 =
        p 252 − (f1 − 25)2, where f1 (risk) is an
        integer ∈ {1, . . . , 25}. There are three investors, each with different importance weights for risk and return as
        follows:
        1
        • Investor 1: wf1 = 0.2, wf2 = 0.8 (more focused on return).
        • Investor 2: wf1 = 0.5, wf2 = 0.5 (equal importance on risk and return).
        • Investor 3: wf1 = 0.9, wf2 = 0.1 (more focused on risk).
        Please design an appropriate method and implement the following tasks through programming:
        (4.1) Generate the portfolio set: Based on the formula mentioned above, generate all possible investment port folio options, i.e., the set of (f1, f2). (1 mark)
        (4.2) Design a scoring function: For each investor, design a scoring function in the form: Score = S(f1, f2, wf1
        , wf2
        )
        where wf1
        and wf2
        are the weights for risk and return, respectively, and f1 and f2 are the risk and return values
        of the portfolio. A larger score indicates a better matching. Explain the meaning of this scoring function. (1
        mark)
        (4.3) Calculate the score for each portfolio for the three investors based on the scoring function. (1 mark)
        (4.4) Identify the highest-scoring portfolio for each investor and output the results. (1 mark)
        (4.5) Result analysis and explanation: Analyse the highest-scoring portfolios for each investor and explain why
        these portfolios align with their preferences. Discuss how changes in the weights wF 1 and wF 2 affect the final
        portfolio selection. (1 mark)
        3 Paper Reading and Presentation (10 marks)
        A list of papers on applications of multi-objective optimisation is provided. Each group will select one of those
        to read and present the paper orally with slides on 28 April 2025 (10am-1pm & 4:30pm-7:30pm). A paper can
        only be selected by no more than one group (first come, first serve).
        You are also encouraged to look for other papers on applications of multi-objective optimisation that are
        not in the provided list. If such a case, please send the papers to the instructor of the course for approval first.
        All individuals in the group should participate and contribute to the paper reading, slides preparation and
        oral presentation.
        3.1 Presentation slides
        Please limit your slide count to approximately 8 to 12 slides. Below is an example structure/outline:
        • Title page: information of the paper (title, publication, year), group members, contribution percentage1
        .
        • Background and motivation/impact of the work: What is the topic? Why it is important and should be
        investigated.
        • Challenges & why multi-objective optimisation methods: What are the challenges of tackling such prob lems? Why using multi-objective optimisation methods (thus the necessity)? What are the multiple
        objectives?
        • Contributions/claims/take-home messages of the work.
        • Problem formulation/modelling: input, output, search space, objective(s), constraint(s), etc. Focusing on
        core messages instead of explaining mathematical formulations in details. But mathematical formulations
        (if any) should be provided on slides.
        • Theoretical analysis and/or experimental studies & discussion: What are the theoretical analysis and/or
        experimental studies that support the claims/contributions of the paper? How is the outcome? Any
        insightful observation?
        • Further work & limitations of the work.
        • Your thoughts about the work: insights, criticism, etc.
        1
        Individual contribution to the presentation represented by a percentage ∈ {0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, . . . , 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%}.
        Contributions of all individuals in a group sum to 100%. If an individual’s contribution is claimed to be 0, all members should
        provide a written letter to support the claim. The contributions can not be revised after slides submission deadline.
        2
        3.2 Oral presentation
        • All students should present orally.
        • Note that those are normal lecture sessions, therefore all students should be present in both sessions
        (10am-1pm & 4:30pm-7:30pm, 28 April 2025).
        • We are going to randomly call on a group to present. A no-show results in 0 mark.
        • Each group can present for no more than 10 minutes, followed by 6 minutes Q&A2
        . Note that you will be
        stopped when time’s up.
        3.3 Evaluation
        • All groups/individuals will be assessed according to the following criteria:
        – Presentation slides (5 marks): correctness, clarity, conciseness, format, completeness. – This is group
        assessment, score denoted as S
        s
        .
        – Oral presentation + Q&A (5 marks): correctness, clarity, conciseness, completeness, understanding,
        etc. – This is individual assessment, score denoted as S
        o
        .
        • This is a group work. If you work individually, your score is (S
        s + S
        o
        ) × 0.9.
        • Assuming a group of n students (n ∈ {2, 3, 4}), with group score S
        s
        for slides and individual score
        S1
        o
        , . . . , Sn
        o
        for oral presentation and Q&A, and individual contribution C1, . . . , Cn, respectively. If Ci = 0,
        then a student i’s score is.
        If an individual’ total score of problem solving and presentation is above 20, then the overflow will be
        counted as his/her bonus in the total mark of this course3
        .
        4 Submission
        4.1 What to submit
        Each student should submit a zip file named as casestudy-{groupnumber}.zip. Inside the zip, there should
        be:
        • A pdf file named as solutions.pdf for problem solving task detailed in Section 2.
        • A pdf or pptx file named as presentation.pdf or presentation.pptx, respectively, to be used in the
        oral presentation.
        4.2 Where to submit
        Upload your zip file via Moodle.
        2The length of presentation and Q&A may be subject to change based on the number of groups.
        3The formulas for calculating scores may be subject to change due to the actual group size and numbers.
        3
        4.3 Submission deadline
        23:59 (Beijing time) April 27 (Sunday), 2025.
        No further update or edit (even minor) is allowed after this deadline.
        A group will get 0 as score for problem solving if any of the following cases happens:
        • Plagiarism.
        • Missed the deadline for submission.
        A group will get 0 as score for presentation slides if any of the following cases happens:
        • No show.
        • Missed the deadline for submission.
        An individual will get 0 as score for oral presentation if any of the following cases happens:
        • No show.
        • Not presentation or negligible/meaningless presentation (e.g., presenting paper title and members’ names).
        4

        請加QQ:99515681  郵箱:99515681@qq.com   WX:codinghelp




         

        掃一掃在手機打開當前頁
      1. 上一篇:7CCSMNSE代做、代寫C++,Python程序語言
      2. 下一篇:PROG2007代做、代寫Python編程設計
      3. ·代寫COMP9021、代做Python程序設計
      4. ·CSC1002代做、Python程序設計代寫
      5. ·CE235編程代寫、代做python程序設計
      6. ·COMP09110代做、代寫Python程序設計
      7. ·代寫MATH36031、Python程序設計代做
      8. ·代做COMP9021、python程序設計代寫
      9. ·代寫COMP0034、代做Java/Python程序設計
      10. ·CS540編程代寫、代做Python程序設計
      11. ·代寫COP3502、Python程序設計代做
      12. ·代做MLE 5217、代寫Python程序設計
      13. 合肥生活資訊

        合肥圖文信息
        急尋熱仿真分析?代做熱仿真服務+熱設計優化
        急尋熱仿真分析?代做熱仿真服務+熱設計優化
        出評 開團工具
        出評 開團工具
        挖掘機濾芯提升發動機性能
        挖掘機濾芯提升發動機性能
        海信羅馬假日洗衣機亮相AWE  復古美學與現代科技完美結合
        海信羅馬假日洗衣機亮相AWE 復古美學與現代
        合肥機場巴士4號線
        合肥機場巴士4號線
        合肥機場巴士3號線
        合肥機場巴士3號線
        合肥機場巴士2號線
        合肥機場巴士2號線
        合肥機場巴士1號線
        合肥機場巴士1號線
      14. 短信驗證碼 酒店vi設計 NBA直播 幣安下載

        關于我們 | 打賞支持 | 廣告服務 | 聯系我們 | 網站地圖 | 免責聲明 | 幫助中心 | 友情鏈接 |

        Copyright © 2025 hfw.cc Inc. All Rights Reserved. 合肥網 版權所有
        ICP備06013414號-3 公安備 42010502001045

        国产亚洲精品AAAA片APP| 亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区| 九九在线观看精品视频6| 国产精品久久久久久久福利院| 中文国产成人精品久久不卡| 亚洲欧洲精品视频在线观看| 久久国产精品一国产精品| 亚洲精品无码不卡在线播HE | 国产高清国内精品福利99久久| 91精品天美精东蜜桃传媒入口| 亚洲精品国产美女久久久| 久久精品亚洲男人的天堂| 亚洲国产精品成人| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕| 日韩乱码人妻无码系列中文字幕| 亚洲日韩国产精品无码av| 久久99精品久久久久久国产| 中文字幕日韩专区精品系列| 好湿好大硬得深一点动态图91精品福利一区二区| 日韩免费在线观看| 日本精品视频在线观看| 一本一道久久a久久精品综合| 日韩免费视频在线观看| 欧美日韩精品不卡在线观看| 日韩欧美群交P内射捆绑| 日韩人妻无码免费视频一区二区三区 | 久久99国产精品99久久| 国内精品综合久久久40p| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 最新国产在线精品观看| 兽交精品99高清毛片| 国内精品一线二线三线黄| 中文字幕在线精品视频入口一区| 国产亚洲精品福利在线无卡一 | 999这里只有精品| 久久亚洲精品成人av无码网站| 亚洲精品WWW久久久久久| 香蕉依依精品视频在线播放 | 久久精品国产精品亚洲艾草网| 久久久久女人精品毛片九一| 99re6这里只有精品|