合肥生活安徽新聞合肥交通合肥房產(chǎn)生活服務(wù)合肥教育合肥招聘合肥旅游文化藝術(shù)合肥美食合肥地圖合肥社保合肥醫(yī)院企業(yè)服務(wù)合肥法律

        代寫CDS526、代做c/c++,Python程序設(shè)計
        代寫CDS526、代做c/c++,Python程序設(shè)計

        時間:2025-03-27  來源:合肥網(wǎng)hfw.cc  作者:hfw.cc 我要糾錯



        CDS526: Artificial Intelligence-based Optimization
        Case Study: Multi-objective Optimisation
        1 Task
        This case study is composed of two main tasks, problem solving (detailed in Section 2) and paper presentation
        (detailed in Section 3), aiming at strengthening your understanding of multi-objective optimisation and appli cations of multi-objective optimisation algorithms. This case study will take 20% in your final mark of this
        course (thus 20 points).
        This is a group project. Each group should be composed of no more than four individuals. Each individual’s
        mark depends on the correctness of the answers to the questions (cf. Section 2) and his/her performance in
        group presentations (cf. Section 3).
        2 Problem Solving (10 marks)
        Context
        An investor needs to select an appropriate portfolio from a set of investment options, aiming to minimize
        investment risk degree (f1) and maximize investment return degree (f2). There are currently seven portfolio
        options, with their corresponding f1 (risk) and f2 (return) values as follows:
        A(1, 1), B(10, 9), C(5, 1), D(2, 3), E(8, 4), F(5, 5), G(7, 6)
        Here, a lower f1 value indicates lower risk, and a higher f2 value indicates higher return. f1 and f2 are integers
        ∈ {1, . . . , 50}.
        Question 1: Portfolio comparison. (2 marks)
        (1.1) Comparing Portfolio F(5, 5) and Portfolio C(5, 1), which one is better? Analyse from the perspectives of
        risk and return and provide reasoning. (1 mark)
        (1.2) Comparing Portfolio G(7, 6) and Portfolio E(8, 4), which one is better? Analyse from the perspectives of
        risk and return and provide reasoning. (1 mark)
        Question 2: Identify all non-dominated solutions in the given seven portfolios. (1 mark)
        Question 3: Investor preference matching. (2 marks)
        There are currently two investors:
        • The first investor is conservative, aiming to minimize investment risk (f1) and having lower requirements
        for return (f2).
        • The second investor is aggressive, willing to take higher risks (f1) and aiming solely to maximize investment
        return (f2).
        From the non-dominated solution set, select the most suitable portfolio for each investor and explain the rea soning.
        Question 4: Investment portfolio selection based on preferences. (5 marks)
        Assume that the investment portfolio options satisfy the formula f2 =
        p 252 − (f1 − 25)2, where f1 (risk) is an
        integer ∈ {1, . . . , 25}. There are three investors, each with different importance weights for risk and return as
        follows:
        1
        • Investor 1: wf1 = 0.2, wf2 = 0.8 (more focused on return).
        • Investor 2: wf1 = 0.5, wf2 = 0.5 (equal importance on risk and return).
        • Investor 3: wf1 = 0.9, wf2 = 0.1 (more focused on risk).
        Please design an appropriate method and implement the following tasks through programming:
        (4.1) Generate the portfolio set: Based on the formula mentioned above, generate all possible investment port folio options, i.e., the set of (f1, f2). (1 mark)
        (4.2) Design a scoring function: For each investor, design a scoring function in the form: Score = S(f1, f2, wf1
        , wf2
        )
        where wf1
        and wf2
        are the weights for risk and return, respectively, and f1 and f2 are the risk and return values
        of the portfolio. A larger score indicates a better matching. Explain the meaning of this scoring function. (1
        mark)
        (4.3) Calculate the score for each portfolio for the three investors based on the scoring function. (1 mark)
        (4.4) Identify the highest-scoring portfolio for each investor and output the results. (1 mark)
        (4.5) Result analysis and explanation: Analyse the highest-scoring portfolios for each investor and explain why
        these portfolios align with their preferences. Discuss how changes in the weights wF 1 and wF 2 affect the final
        portfolio selection. (1 mark)
        3 Paper Reading and Presentation (10 marks)
        A list of papers on applications of multi-objective optimisation is provided. Each group will select one of those
        to read and present the paper orally with slides on 28 April 2025 (10am-1pm & 4:30pm-7:30pm). A paper can
        only be selected by no more than one group (first come, first serve).
        You are also encouraged to look for other papers on applications of multi-objective optimisation that are
        not in the provided list. If such a case, please send the papers to the instructor of the course for approval first.
        All individuals in the group should participate and contribute to the paper reading, slides preparation and
        oral presentation.
        3.1 Presentation slides
        Please limit your slide count to approximately 8 to 12 slides. Below is an example structure/outline:
        • Title page: information of the paper (title, publication, year), group members, contribution percentage1
        .
        • Background and motivation/impact of the work: What is the topic? Why it is important and should be
        investigated.
        • Challenges & why multi-objective optimisation methods: What are the challenges of tackling such prob lems? Why using multi-objective optimisation methods (thus the necessity)? What are the multiple
        objectives?
        • Contributions/claims/take-home messages of the work.
        • Problem formulation/modelling: input, output, search space, objective(s), constraint(s), etc. Focusing on
        core messages instead of explaining mathematical formulations in details. But mathematical formulations
        (if any) should be provided on slides.
        • Theoretical analysis and/or experimental studies & discussion: What are the theoretical analysis and/or
        experimental studies that support the claims/contributions of the paper? How is the outcome? Any
        insightful observation?
        • Further work & limitations of the work.
        • Your thoughts about the work: insights, criticism, etc.
        1
        Individual contribution to the presentation represented by a percentage ∈ {0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, . . . , 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%}.
        Contributions of all individuals in a group sum to 100%. If an individual’s contribution is claimed to be 0, all members should
        provide a written letter to support the claim. The contributions can not be revised after slides submission deadline.
        2
        3.2 Oral presentation
        • All students should present orally.
        • Note that those are normal lecture sessions, therefore all students should be present in both sessions
        (10am-1pm & 4:30pm-7:30pm, 28 April 2025).
        • We are going to randomly call on a group to present. A no-show results in 0 mark.
        • Each group can present for no more than 10 minutes, followed by 6 minutes Q&A2
        . Note that you will be
        stopped when time’s up.
        3.3 Evaluation
        • All groups/individuals will be assessed according to the following criteria:
        – Presentation slides (5 marks): correctness, clarity, conciseness, format, completeness. – This is group
        assessment, score denoted as S
        s
        .
        – Oral presentation + Q&A (5 marks): correctness, clarity, conciseness, completeness, understanding,
        etc. – This is individual assessment, score denoted as S
        o
        .
        • This is a group work. If you work individually, your score is (S
        s + S
        o
        ) × 0.9.
        • Assuming a group of n students (n ∈ {2, 3, 4}), with group score S
        s
        for slides and individual score
        S1
        o
        , . . . , Sn
        o
        for oral presentation and Q&A, and individual contribution C1, . . . , Cn, respectively. If Ci = 0,
        then a student i’s score is.
        If an individual’ total score of problem solving and presentation is above 20, then the overflow will be
        counted as his/her bonus in the total mark of this course3
        .
        4 Submission
        4.1 What to submit
        Each student should submit a zip file named as casestudy-{groupnumber}.zip. Inside the zip, there should
        be:
        • A pdf file named as solutions.pdf for problem solving task detailed in Section 2.
        • A pdf or pptx file named as presentation.pdf or presentation.pptx, respectively, to be used in the
        oral presentation.
        4.2 Where to submit
        Upload your zip file via Moodle.
        2The length of presentation and Q&A may be subject to change based on the number of groups.
        3The formulas for calculating scores may be subject to change due to the actual group size and numbers.
        3
        4.3 Submission deadline
        23:59 (Beijing time) April 27 (Sunday), 2025.
        No further update or edit (even minor) is allowed after this deadline.
        A group will get 0 as score for problem solving if any of the following cases happens:
        • Plagiarism.
        • Missed the deadline for submission.
        A group will get 0 as score for presentation slides if any of the following cases happens:
        • No show.
        • Missed the deadline for submission.
        An individual will get 0 as score for oral presentation if any of the following cases happens:
        • No show.
        • Not presentation or negligible/meaningless presentation (e.g., presenting paper title and members’ names).
        4

        請加QQ:99515681  郵箱:99515681@qq.com   WX:codinghelp




         

        掃一掃在手機(jī)打開當(dāng)前頁
      1. 上一篇:7CCSMNSE代做、代寫C++,Python程序語言
      2. 下一篇:PROG2007代做、代寫Python編程設(shè)計
      3. ·代寫COMP9021、代做Python程序設(shè)計
      4. ·CSC1002代做、Python程序設(shè)計代寫
      5. ·CE235編程代寫、代做python程序設(shè)計
      6. ·COMP09110代做、代寫Python程序設(shè)計
      7. ·代寫MATH36031、Python程序設(shè)計代做
      8. ·代做COMP9021、python程序設(shè)計代寫
      9. ·代寫COMP0034、代做Java/Python程序設(shè)計
      10. ·CS540編程代寫、代做Python程序設(shè)計
      11. ·代寫COP3502、Python程序設(shè)計代做
      12. ·代做MLE 5217、代寫Python程序設(shè)計
      13. 合肥生活資訊

        合肥圖文信息
        急尋熱仿真分析?代做熱仿真服務(wù)+熱設(shè)計優(yōu)化
        急尋熱仿真分析?代做熱仿真服務(wù)+熱設(shè)計優(yōu)化
        出評 開團(tuán)工具
        出評 開團(tuán)工具
        挖掘機(jī)濾芯提升發(fā)動機(jī)性能
        挖掘機(jī)濾芯提升發(fā)動機(jī)性能
        海信羅馬假日洗衣機(jī)亮相AWE  復(fù)古美學(xué)與現(xiàn)代科技完美結(jié)合
        海信羅馬假日洗衣機(jī)亮相AWE 復(fù)古美學(xué)與現(xiàn)代
        合肥機(jī)場巴士4號線
        合肥機(jī)場巴士4號線
        合肥機(jī)場巴士3號線
        合肥機(jī)場巴士3號線
        合肥機(jī)場巴士2號線
        合肥機(jī)場巴士2號線
        合肥機(jī)場巴士1號線
        合肥機(jī)場巴士1號線
      14. 短信驗證碼 酒店vi設(shè)計 NBA直播 幣安下載

        關(guān)于我們 | 打賞支持 | 廣告服務(wù) | 聯(lián)系我們 | 網(wǎng)站地圖 | 免責(zé)聲明 | 幫助中心 | 友情鏈接 |

        Copyright © 2025 hfw.cc Inc. All Rights Reserved. 合肥網(wǎng) 版權(quán)所有
        ICP備06013414號-3 公安備 42010502001045

        国产成人综合日韩精品无码| 久久精品无码av| 999成人精品视频在线| 亚洲精品福利网泷泽萝拉| 日韩免费观看的一级毛片| 日韩精品亚洲专区在线影视 | 91精品视频免费| 亚洲嫩草影院久久精品| 国产精品国产三级国产AV麻豆| 精品国产麻豆免费人成网站| 日韩精品一卡2卡3卡4卡新区乱码| 国产成人精品免费午夜app | 亚洲精品无码久久久久| 亚洲?V无码成人精品区日韩| 91精品国产亚洲爽啪在线观看| 国产精品麻豆入口| 国产精品爽爽影院在线| 99aiav国产精品视频| 国产精品一区12p| 91精品啪在线观看国产线免费| 久久久久国产成人精品亚洲午夜| 无码专区人妻系列日韩精品少妇| 日韩在线观看完整版电影| 成人精品国产亚洲欧洲| 老色鬼在线精品视频| 精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 99re6在线视频精品免费| 久久精品国产亚洲7777| 久久九九久精品国产| 国内精品免费久久影院| 亚洲欧美日韩国产精品一区| 国产亚州精品女人久久久久久| 日韩一区二区在线播放| 国产精品成人免费综合| 国产精品久久久久国产精品| 精品免费人成视频app| 野狼第一精品社区| 正在播放国产精品每日更新 | 国内精品一线二线三线黄| 日韩成人免费视频播放| 竹菊影视欧美日韩一区二区三区四区五区|